Euclyd

Comment savons nous ce que nous savons ?
Un nouveau livre considère l’”histoire longue de la connaissance” des traditions orales antiques à l’avènement des universités au Moyen Age et Internet.

Un article en anglais de Laura Miller sur Salon.com:

We live in the information age, when networked computers give millions of users unprecedented access to communications and data. But so what? That is, in effect, what Ian McNeely and Lisa Wolverton have to say at the conclusion of « Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet. » The authors are indeed hard to impress. Their small book takes a long view — an exceedingly long view, beginning with the birth of Western civilization in the philosophical academies of ancient Greece and wending its way, century by century, to the present. McNeely and Wolverton remain unpersuaded that the Internet is as revolutionary as it’s cracked up to be.

« Reinventing Knowledge » partakes of a contemporary academic trend that views institutions as the major shapers of people and societies (rather than, say, vast economic forces or the genius and influence of « great men »). Its subject is « knowledge, » and the « production, preservation and transmission » of it, although unfortunately the authors never quite manage to define what knowledge means to them. True, the term is elusive; one generation’s knowledge is the next’s rank superstition. In the Middle Ages, thanks to Aristotle, everyone knew that maggots generated spontaneously out of rotting flesh, and this fact was considered to be top-grade knowledge, though we now know it to be incorrect. On the other hand, some people today are convinced that the 1969 moon landing never really happened, and despite the so-called evidence they’ve marshaled in defense of this belief, hardly anyone would call it knowledge.

La suite sur Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/08/28/knowledge/index.html)